Litigation

CCP Files Amicus Brief in U.S. v. Ring

DATELINE: April 4, 2012 CONTACT: Sarah Lee, Communications Director, The Center for Competitive Politics, 770.598.7961   Alexandria, Va. – The Center for Competitive Politics (CCP) has  joined with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) in filing an amicus brief in the case of United States v. Ring, supporting the defendant and his First Amendment rights. Kevin Ring, a lobbyist, was tried [...]

Filed Under: Blog, Featured Content, First Amendment, corruption, lobbying, NADCL, US v. Ring, Litigation, District Of Columbia

Amicus Brief: United States of America v. Kevin Ring

In Skilling v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2896 (2010), the Supreme Court held that to prove “honest services” fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1346, the government must prove bribery. Id. at 2933. And in United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California, 526 U.S. 398 (1999) , the Court made clear that bribery requires proof [...]

Filed Under: Legal, Legal Center, Comments and Testimony, Litigation

Colorado Supreme Court rules for the First Amendment in Case joined by CCP

Today, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that groups of citizens cannot be treated as a political committee – and have their resources and message limited – unless they explicitly call for the election or defeat of a candidate. CCP participated in the case as a “friend of the court,” in conjunction with the Denver office [...]

Filed Under: Blog, Featured Content, Legal, Super PACs, Litigation, Colorado

Amicus Brief in DeLay v. State

Arguing that laws criminalizing First Amendment conduct must at least be clear, the Center for Competitive Politics filed an amicus brief in the Texas Court of Appeals in DeLay v. State.  

For nearly a decade, Tom DeLay and his colleagues have been involved in a legal challenge concerning the constitutionality of the Texas Election Code.  The case centers on a complaint filed by Texans for Public Justice alleging that even though DeLay and his associates complied with relevant provisions of Texas election law, their use of election funds was somehow illegal. 

 

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized, Litigation

Patriotic Veterans v. Indiana

Copy of the Patriotic Veterans v. Indiana injunction.

Filed Under: Uncategorized, Jurisprudence & Litigation, Litigation

Amicus brief: Farris v. Seabrook

Amicus brief of the Center for Competitive Politics in Farris v. Seabrook.

Filed Under: Uncategorized, Jurisprudence & Litigation, Litigation

Amicus, McComish v. Bennett

-

Filed Under: Uncategorized, Litigation, Arizona

McComish v. Bennett

Amicus brief of the Center for Competitive Politics in the Arizona “matching funds” case.

Filed Under: Uncategorized, Jurisprudence & Litigation, Taxpayer Financed Campaigns, Litigation

Sampson v. Buescher, 10th Cir.

Amicus brief of the Center for Competitive Politics in the Parker North case: Karen Sampson, Becky Cornwell and several others opposed the annexation of their neighborhood of 300 in Parker North, Colo. The group was slapped with a legal complaint for violating Colorado campaign finance law.

Filed Under: Uncategorized, Disclosure, Expenditure, Litigation, Colorado

Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.

Amicus brief of the Center for Competitive Politics.

Filed Under: Uncategorized, Litigation