In Skilling v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2896 (2010), the Supreme Court held that to prove “honest services” fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1346, the government must prove bribery. Id. at 2933. And in United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California, 526 U.S. 398 (1999) , the Court made clear that bribery requires proof [...]
Amicus Brief: United States of America v. Kevin Ring
Filed Under: Legal, Legal Center, Comments and Testimony, Litigation
NEWS RELEASE: Allen Dickerson Will Testify Before Maryland House Ways and Means Committee
DATELINE: Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2012 CONTACT: Sarah Lee, Communications Director, The Center for Competitive Politics 770.598.7961 ALEXANDRIA, Va. – The Center for Competitive Politics’ Legal Director Allen Dickerson was invited to testify on Wednesday, February 15, at 1 pm before the Maryland House Committee on Ways and Means. He was invited by the office of [...]
Filed Under: Featured Content, Legal Center, Press Releases, Uncategorized, Comments and Testimony, Maryland
Amicus Brief in US v. Danielczyk
The Center for Competitive Politics yesterday filed an amicus brief in U.S. v. Danielczyk, a case that began in May of 2011 when a federal judge in Virginia struck down the ban on direct corporate contributions to federal candidates. The case is currently before the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Filed Under: Uncategorized, Contributions & Limits, First Amendment, Comments and Testimony
Milyo and Primo Amicus Brief in US v. Danielczyk
One of the issues presented by this appeal is whether laws barring contributions by corporations to candidates for federal office promote a positive view of government by the public by reducing corruption or the appearance of corruption. In support of this proposition, the United States relies upon research conducted by Amici, Dr. Primo and Dr. Milyo. Dr. Primo and Dr. Milyo do not believe that their research supports such a conclusion. Thus, Amici have an interest in correcting these mistaken assertions by the United States both to protect the integrity of their scholarship and to insure that their research is properly understood by the Court. Dr. Primo and Dr. Milyo will explain herein that laws regulating corporate contributions to candidates for federal office have little effect upon public perceptions of government. Thus, Amici’s research calls into question a key justification for such laws.
Filed Under: Uncategorized, First Amendment, Comments and Testimony
Testimony of Allen Dickerson before the Pennsylvania Senate Democratic Policy Committee
This is the testimony of Allen Dickerson before the Pennsylvania Senate Democratic Policy Committee, September 23rd, 2011.
Filed Under: Uncategorized, Issue Advocacy, Comments and Testimony
Comments of CCP Legal Director Allen Dickerson on Representative Christopher Van Hollen’s Petition to the FEC
On August 22, 2011, CCP Legal Director Allen Dickerson submitted comments to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in opposition to a Petition for Rulemaking filed with the FEC by Representative Christopher Van Hollen on April 21, 2011.
CCP believes that Congressman Van Hollen’s petition misinterprets existing law while inappropriately attempting to enact by regulatory action what Congress has already rejected in 2010′s failed DISCLOSE Act.
If this petition was approved, the FEC would require broad, consitutionally-questionable disclosure requirements on a variety of organizations.
Filed Under: Uncategorized, Disclosure, Expenditure, Comments and Testimony
Comments of CCP Legal Director Allen Dickerson on the James Madison Center for Free Speech’s Petition to the FEC
On August 22, 2011, CCP Legal Director Allen Dickerson submitted comments to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in support of a Petition for Rulemaking filed with the FEC by the James Madison Center for Free Speech on January 26, 2010.
CCP believes that the James Madison Center for Free Speech’s petition properly aligns FEC regulations with the understanding of the First Amendment recently articulated by the Supreme Court in its January 2010 decision in Citizens United v. FEC.
The FEC should approve this peition, effectively repealing existing FEC regulations that have since been invalidated by the Supreme Court.
Filed Under: Uncategorized, Expenditure, Jurisprudence & Litigation, Comments and Testimony
Testimony of CCP Chairman Bradley A. Smith to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the House Committee on Small Business
Written testimony of CCP Chairman Bradley A. Smith at a May 12, 2011 joint hearing of the United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the United States House Committee on Small Business, concerning a proposed Executive Order by the Obama Administration that would require bidders on government contracts to disclose their political spending.
Filed Under: Uncategorized, Disclosure, Pay to Play, Comments and Testimony
Comments of CCP Academic Advisor Joel Gora to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the House Committee on Small Business
Joel Gora, Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs at Brooklyn Law School and member of CCP’s Board of Academic Advisors, submitted comments to a May 12, 2011 joint hearing of the United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the United States House Committee on Small Business, concerning a proposed Executive Order by the Obama Administration that would require bidders on government contracts to disclose their political spending.
Filed Under: Uncategorized, Disclosure, Pay to Play, Comments and Testimony
Comments of CCP President Sean Parnell to the United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights
CCP President Sean Parnell submitted comments to an April 12, 2011 hearing of the United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights, on the subject of S. 750, the Fair Elections Now Act (FENA). If passed, FENA would institute taxpayer financed elections for candidates to federally-elected offices. In our comments, CCP noted that FENA relies upon false premises and flawed analysis and would almost exclusively benefit entrenched incumbents and other political insiders without providing any noticeable benefits to the public.
Filed Under: Uncategorized, Taxpayer Financed Campaigns, Comments and Testimony
FEC Comments March 7th, 2012
FEC Comments, Citizens United 2:3:2012