Home > Blog > Another day, another dramatic overreach by campaign finance “reformers”
BLOG
Another day, another dramatic overreach by campaign finance “reformers”
Published on April 1, 2009 10:40 AM
Category: Contributions & Limits, Pay to Play
We at the Center for Competitive Politics are used to seeing broad sweeping claims by the self-anointed campaign finance "reform" community, and equally expansive proposals to wipe away core First Amendment political rights in an effort to somehow deal with real or imagined "corruption." Just yesterday, Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois proposed taxpayer handouts for politicians to run their campaigns, because apparently it's tiring and time consuming having to ask for contributions from people (coming soon, the Free Binky's, Milk, and Cookies for Weary Candidates Act). But even we were surprised to find buried in the report of Governor Pat Quinn's Illinois Reform Commission, released yesterday, a recommendation for "reform" that would strip huge numbers of citizens of the right to contribute to candidates they support.
Under the Campaign Finance section, recommendation #4 stood out. It reads:
4. Extend Pay-to-Play Ban. Ban contributions to state constitutional or legislative campaigns from contractors who have obtained or are seeking state contracts of more than $50,000 during the election cycle and companies engaged in regulated practices. (emphasis mine)
Companies engaged in regulated practices? What does that mean? In the most expansive reading, that's every company in Illinois, all of which are subject to various health, occupational, and safety regulations. A more likely but hardly less troubling reading would mean any company that requires a state license to operate.
So, any doctor or attorney in private practice or who owns a portion of their practice, would be unable to contribute to candidates. Many building contractors, whether they do government work or not, have state licenses. The Illinois Department of Professional Regulation lists more than 250 distinct professions that would presumably fall under the "regulated practices" definition. This includes:
Accountants
Architects
Barbers
Dentists
Funeral Director
Hair Dresser
Locksmith
Marriage/Family Therapist
Real Estate Broker
Roofing Contractor
These are occupations, of course, where it is fairly common to see professionals who own their business and would be barred from contributing to candidates. In addition to the individuals who must have a state license, certain businesses must also have state licenses to operate. These include businesses in the following industries:
Alchohol sales
Contractors
Finance
Insurance
Landscaping
Pet shop
Trucking
Vehicle sales
The scope of this proposal is staggering, and would fundamentally disenfranchise nearly every business owner in the state who requires a business license to operate (which appears to be most of them - there are also licenses required just to be in any sort of business and collect sales taxes).
Dramatic over-reach by "reformers" is nothing new, but this proposal breaks new ground in the effort to strip select citizens of their First Amendment rights.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/blog/trackback/another-day-another-dramatic-overreach-by-campaign-finance-reformers
Login or Sign-Up to Comment
