Home Search
 

Search the Blog

 

 

Browse Blog Category

 
 

Twitter


 

Tell Your Story

Share your experience with campaign finance and First Amendment regulation. Enter your e-mail below.

 

 

Blog Roll

Ballot Access News

Citizens in Charge

Electionline.org

Election Law Blog

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law Center

Express Advocacy

First Amendment Center

HoltzmanVogel blog

Make No Law

National Journal's Under the Influence

Nonprofit & Foundation Advocacy Blog

Pay to Play Law Blog

Political Activity Law

Public Affairs Perspective

Public Participation Project

Save Our States

The Volokh Conspiracy

Votelaw

 
printPrint Page

BLOG

Ineffective and Expensive

Published on June 17, 2008 05:11 PM

Sean Parnell

Category: Taxpayer Financed Campaigns

We were recently sent the outstanding comments of Assemblyman Jay Webber of New Jersey, addressing the state's proposal to expand their previous failed experiment with taxpayer funded political campaigns:

Download file Assemblyman Webber's Letter

As Assemblyman Webber succinctly states, "The role of government in our electoral process is to guarantee some level of transparency and honesty, not to pick winners. This bill turns that idea on its head by essentially empowering the government to tell us what we can say, when we can say it, and how much we can say it." 

Assemblyman Webber also notes that the Garden State's taxpayer funded political campaigns scheme would limit contributions from citizens and political speech from candidates, undermine constitutional rights, do nothing to improve voter confidence, and require a blank check from a state that is already drowning in debt. 

CCP President Sean Parnell also recently sent a letter to members of the New Jersey General Assembly Budget Committee, addressing the claims of "reformers" that taxpayers actually save "taxpayer dollars by reducing inappropriate giveaways to campaign contributors,"  under such schemes. Not surprising to those who follow the "reform" debate and actually care about facts as much as wishful thinking, there is no evidence to support the claim. As the letter explains,

"[Arizona's] final general fund budget passed prior to implementation of taxpayer funded political campaigns was $6,279,478,000 (fiscal year 2001). For the most recent fiscal year, 2008, the State of Arizona had a total general fund budget of $10,618,946,400, an increase of nearly 70%.

At the same time, the total tax burden on Arizona residents has increased since implementation of taxpayer funded political campaigns, rising from an average of 10.4% of income in the years 1997 - 2001 to approximately 10.7% since 2002.

This increased spending and tax burden came at a time when its economy grew approximately 31.5% and per-capita output per resident by 9%."

The number are Maine are equally distressing for "reformers," or at least would be if they paid attention to such things. Full text of the letter is available here:

Download file CCP Letter to New Jersey General Assembly Budget Committee

 

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/blog/trackback/ineffective-and-expensive

Login or Sign-Up to Comment

Bookmark and Share