Home Search
 

Search the Blog

 

 

Browse Blog Category

 
 

Twitter


 

Tell Your Story

Share your experience with campaign finance and First Amendment regulation. Enter your e-mail below.

 

 

Blog Roll

Ballot Access News

Citizens in Charge

Electionline.org

Election Law Blog

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law Center

Express Advocacy

First Amendment Center

HoltzmanVogel blog

Make No Law

National Journal's Under the Influence

Nonprofit & Foundation Advocacy Blog

Pay to Play Law Blog

Political Activity Law

Public Affairs Perspective

Public Participation Project

Save Our States

The Volokh Conspiracy

Votelaw

 

BLOG

Contributions & Limits

CCP testimony supports political freedom in Pa.

Published on August 19, 2010 12:07 PM

Laura Renz

Category: Contributions & Limits

Earlier this week, the Pennsylvania Senate State Government Committee held a field hearing in Meadville, Pa. to discuss two pieces of legislation regarding contribution limits and enhanced disclosure requirements. I testified on behalf of CCP in support of preserving the state's free system of allowing citizens to contribute to candidates of their choice without arbitrary government restrictions.

MoveOn.org “reformers” mask legal requirement as virtue

Published on August 10, 2010 11:50 AM

Sean Parnell

Category: Contributions & Limits, Political Committees & 527s, Taxpayer Financed Campaigns

Today I learned via e-mail that there will be a "rally" in Albany, New York to urge Senators Schumer and Gillibrand to "Fight Corporate Corruption of Washington" (curious italicization choices in the original). The message appears to be part of a nationwide campaign led by MoveOn (formerly MoveOn.org, of course) to push for a handful of campaign finance and ethics "reform" measures. Other organizations supporting today's "rallies" (you'll see why I'm using quotation marks around

FEC frees indy groups to spend in 2010

Published on July 23, 2010 10:55 AM

Scott Kenyon, David Scott

Category: Contributions & Limits, Disclosure, Independent Speech

The Federal Election Commission signed off on the plans of two independent political groups to spend freely on politics yesterday in a post-Citizens United consensus decision. On a 5-1 vote, the FEC approved two advisory opinions applying the logic of the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United and an appellate court decision in SpeechNow.org v. FEC. The Center for Competitive Politics, along with the Institute for Justice, represents SpeechNow.org.

Nominee for the 2010 Inigo Montoya Award, “Campaign Finance Reform” division

Published on July 16, 2010 03:15 PM

Sean Parnell

Category: Contributions & Limits, Faulty Assumptions, Taxpayer Financed Campaigns

The Center for Governmental Studies (CGS) recently released a report on so-called campaign finance "reform" in Los Angeles, Money and Power in the City of Angels. The report is a look at the "effectiveness of Los Angeles municipal campaign finance reforms" and the authors also "suggest additional reforms to strengthen existing campaign finance laws." Los Angeles already has many of the features of campaign finance "reform" that advocates claim are necessary to ward off corrupti

Contribution limits and voting rights

Published on July 12, 2010

Allison Hayward

Category: Contributions & Limits

Is it time to ask the question: do low contribution limits run afoul of the Voting Rights Act? Or, put another way, why might they not? First, one might say that the Voting Rights Act, passed in 1965 and renewed several times since then, secures rights contingent to voting. Campaigns and other political frou-frou aren't "voting." That point might have made sense in the past, but the VRA today has been construed to apply to redistricting and at-large voting, neither of which impede castin

Revisions to DISCLOSE on eve of House vote

Published on June 23, 2010 08:20 PM

Jeff Patch

Category: Contributions & Limits, Disclosure, Expenditure, First Amendment, Independent Speech, Political Parties, Stand By Your Ad

No fireworks exploded at this afternoon's House Rules Committee hearing on the DISCLOSE Act (H.R. 5175). First Amendment political rights, though, remain at serious risk of going up in smoke as the majority moves forward with an ill-advised bill to ban a significant amount of political speech that was legal even before Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. After two false starts (one before Memorial Day and the second last week), the Committee adopted a rule that provides for an

Al Greene: Campaign finance reform hero?

Published on June 19, 2010

Brad Smith

Category: Contributions & Limits, Other

Over at the Politico's Arena feature, a reader named Art Harman makes a good point:  Shouldn't South Carolina congressional candidate Alvin Greene be the poster boy for campaign finance reform?  As Harman notes, "he did his best to conform to the liberal ideal of spending no money, raising no PAC money, running no expensive TV ads, and in general refusing to taint himself with the apparent evils of money.  And the voters rewarded his frugality and noble refusal to accept mone

Gale forecast to hit campaign finance house of cards in AOR 2010-11

Published on June 16, 2010 03:59 PM

Allison Hayward

Category: Contributions & Limits, Coordination, Disclosure, Expenditure, Independent Speech

Perkins Coie's Mark Elias (the tall one) has submitted to the FEC an Advisory Opinion Request on behalf of "Commonsense 10." This group, unlike many, wants to be a federal political committee. They just want to behave like none before it, but raising and spending corporate, union and large individual contributions without regard to the limits imposed on committees by federal law. Then, they want to make unlimited independent expenditures in federal elections. "That's

Competition and contribution limits

Published on May 25, 2010 09:12 AM

The Skeptic

Category: Contributions & Limits

Several months ago, the Brennan Center went all jiggy over a report, co-authored by Tom Stratmann of the George Mason University Economics Department, that they claimed showed that low contribution limits improved competitiveness in elections and helped challengers.  From their editorial in The Hill: But our study found that low contribution limits cut into this advantage and help challengers. With lower contribution limits, incumbents cannot amass the types of war chests that

Van Hollen-Schumer waiting game continues

Published on April 15, 2010

Jeff Patch

Category: Contributions & Limits, Independent Speech, Jurisprudence & Litigation, Political Committees & 527s, Stand By Your Ad

Campaign finance watchers continue to pore over the scattered signals emanating from anonymous congressional leadership aides as the legislative drafting process of Van Hollen-Schumer continues behind closed doors. Rep. Chris Van Hollen and Sen. Charles Schumer, the chair and former chair of their respective chambers' campaign committees, announced their framework for a Citizens United response in February—Feb. 11 to be specific. Over two months later, the world hasn't ended, corpor

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10   Next